Ah, the things that turn up in my online mailbox.
The little PDFs I've uploaded here showed up over the weekend. I read and re-read them, gotten about 50 cents worth of free legal advice and decided to post them here for reader comment.
As nearly as I can tell, political power isn't the only thing Cindy Wilson has been accused of abusing in recent years. Beyond that observation, I'll let everybody else draw their own conclusions on this one.
Let the spin begin.
(UPDATE: I have replaced the excerpt of the filing with a PDF of the entire file as sent to me.)
Attachment: MilledgevilleCustody_final.pdf (1331.0KB)
For those seeking the Reader's Digest Ultra Condensed Version . . .
It would appear in the aforementioned legal court documents that M. Cindy Wilson's daughter accused her of abuse and opted to live with her grandparents in Georgia.
. . . ok . . . back to the reading . . .
If anyone else in Anderson County had been accused of this, taken to court as the result of an emergency intervention, the child removed from the home, and permanent loss of custody ordered, they would have been charged and arrested. The case would have gone to court and it would have made the papers.
So please tell me why this woman has not been arrested and put in jail just like the rest of the parents in Anderson County had this happened to them. Is Cindy Wilson above the law? Is the sheriff's office corrupt? Does she really have that much power?
I wouldn't even try to guess, Blockmyview, other than to note that the level of proof required in a custody pleading differs somewhat from the level of proof required for a criminal proceeding. I wouldn't read more into it than is there. For what it's worth, I don't even know if the Anderson County Sheriff was even aware of this. Ask David Crenshaw. He was Sheriff when "it" allegedly happened, whatever "it" was.
It amazes me, though, that followers of Wilson would engage in a pattern of destruction against their opponents using lies, half-truths, innuendo and a series of links to trivial civil and traffic court matters while their own Queen has something like this floating around in court documents. They are, apparently, idiots. Or, at the very least, they don't think these things through.
I'll put my record of a few traffic tickets, one bad check (oops), eviction notices and financial issues over 40 years against her court record of child abuse any day.
There should still be an investigation, as would be conducted had any other parent been accused of this kind of assault. It is a crime to physically abuse another person. Was SLED called? Was there a criminal investigation? If it had been any other parent there would have been one. Why is she so special. I smell cover up.
Seems like it runs in the family, don't it?
Maybe, Elliefant. For sure, a parent who would abuse a child would have no hesitation when it comes to pushing around and abusing somebody outside the family - say, for instance, a political opponent. It's a major character flaw.
I was thinking more along the lines of Cindy Wilson being related to Eddie Moore and the rumblings of spousal abuse. Now Cindy having lost custody of her child as a result of an emergency intervention in an effort of the court to secure a safe and violent free environment for Cindy Wilson's child.
Aren't they related? Cousins or something?
I find this troubling on many levels.
For over a decade Cindy Wilson and her associates have paraded around this county claiming all sorts of nefarious activities by those they oppose politically. Cindy Wilson and her followers have yet to prove a single claim of wrong doing on the part of anyone. Even after throwing over $2 million dollars of taxpayer money away in an "investigation" they still have nothing but rumor an innuendo.
This is really something far more serious. This is not a political failure or a waste of taxpayers' money. This isn't even the spousal abuse that were the grounds upon which Eddie Moore's wife divorced him. This is abuse of a child. There is no one to whom we owe a greater level of safety and protection than our children. Cindy Wilson the sacred trust given to her when God gave her a daughter. Beside her actions even the most serious accusations made against her political opponents pales in comparison.
Court date? For what posting legal court documents?
Why are you trying to intimidate a poster for posting the truth? I thought your side wanted honest open government.
GG ,I see a court date in your future - daneboy-4
I'll take my chances. I've already had all of my shots. Will you be suing me, or will you be hiring a competent attorney?
Why dont you post all your legal casesfrom the past?
I don't need to do that, Cromagnon. You've already done that for me months ago, about three posts down on the thread linked below. The same links appeared even earlier on that forum, but I don't feel like tracing the earliest link at the moment. What's your point?
By the way, I don't see any child abuse, spousal abuse, perjury or drug offenses in there anywhere, do you? Thank God I always had good attorneys.
Are you referring to the perjury committed by a certain assistant administrator, you know the one who wined and wined about what a great person he was and how he didn't commit perjury. Then the next day ran straight to court and changed the lie he swore to under oath?
You mean that court case?
Or do you mean the one that almost was, the one where the wife of a judge or was it a magistrate who was allowed to resign rather than be fired over...what was it false reporting of auto miles... or was it abusing public trust or something like that. Is that the court case you are referring to? Oh, I'm sorry those were just rumors.
No it couldn't have been that one, it was swept under the rug or so the rumor has it.
Could you be referring to Stan Welch's court case? You remember the one convicted of drug trafficking or something like that? Wasn't it twice convicted drug trafficking offenses of more than 10 lbs of an illegal drug?
Or perhaps it is the court case of Cindy Wilson dragging a poor widow into court in an effort to further garnish her exhusbands' estate?
Blockmyview, I believe Daneboy was challenging me to post all of my past court cases. You're straying far afield here.
What I find amazing about all of this, is that Cindy Wilson who has trafficked in all sorts of unsubstantiated allegations about the personal lives of others, was hiding the abuse of her own daughter in her closet.
Has this woman no shame? Did she assume that because she had such in her closet that others must be as equally depraved?
Not that I haven't opposed Cindy for the last 6 years, but I do want to point out that this is simply an allegation from a teenager and the court allowed her to live with her grandmother until another hearing.
That being said, these documents are really old. Is there any sort of update?
It's curious to read this. Even more curious to me is....if this child was "removed" from Mary's care back in 2008.......why did Mary miss so MANY of those ethics meetings while claiming she was caring for her child( who wasn't even there)??? Those were in 2008, weren't they???
Did Mary LIE to the State Ethics board? Not our lil suthern belle!!
Or can she simply say some other mumbo-jumbo which will make it all disappear? That the Georgian courts are incorrect. Mary Wilson is an ELECTED official, so she & her crowd should be a bit more proactive about casting stones or hiding skeletons.
"Seems to me" this is kinda like Edwin and his "alleged" abusiveness, which was swept away by some convienent witnesses.
What a family tree
Say what they want about us. Warm & fuzzies. Yankees. sh*t-disturbers. Whatever.
But never have WE had a child removed due to abusiveness. "Seems to me" she sounds like quite the b*tch behind closed doors.
Guess they'll have to stick with poking fun at my excellent dental work, pony tails or video surveillance systems.
Lemme know which lawyer they use against you this time Gerald. I'm curious if they're to handle the TRUTH.
You must be a member to post in this forum