MODERATOR ACTIONS - Please Read

vor - "It is questioning athority. That is what makes America great."willieh - "Sent here to limit the free speech of bloggers her on the cocklebur."vor - "....censorship. Isn't it wonderful."Do you think you have an inalienable right to post here, or that the rights we enjoy as American citizens include unfettered posting to AndersonTalkZone? Do you think the First Amendment applies here?No. Suck it up, follow the rules, or suffer the consequences....but, for God's sake, quit whining!

-stringcheese

I used to think everyone had a right to post here. No matter what their opinion was. If you recall when JD threw Mr. Hankey under the bus (unjustly as Mr. Hankey was not involved with the three others) and whined to Nick about foul language, I stated that I was not for anyone getting banned on the basis of a few posters wishes. I seem to recall JD penning a LONG goodbye lecture. Seems he just could not have enough and somehow, knew control was soon to be his, by the way he had secret contact with Nick and all.

But JD and Pappy seem to be ruling the roost here now, so Free Speach is dead on The Cocklebur.......opps now Anderson Talkzone.......Opps, lets call it what it is...........

JD'S Place.

Play by his rules.........or don't play at all.

Keep banning people JD, PAPPY, IBVIRGINA, MERRRYMACSC and you'll have what you wished for. A blog for the 4 of you where you can pat each other on the back and stroke your egos.

Gracious me, and here I was thinking this blog has taken a turn to the dark side!

BTW,  If being called a "fool" or "dumbass" is the limit of derrogatory terminology we can expect to get away with, then I stand firm in my belief that the right-wing indeed controls this forum.

-wyatt1sc

you knew this was going to happen. Mr. Hankey did to.
Mr. hankey choose to wait untill they abused the power to speek out but it did not take long.
Mr. Hankey don't want to say too much my time here may be short.
Fight the good fight Wyatt.

Thats a good question as I was not logged in and it showed that I was,Now that I am logged in it shows that I'm not..HMMM whats up doc?

-angelsc

yes angel
it don't work all that well. the problem has been pointed out to our site modorators in the past, but unfortanatly they still choose to use that as a way to see who is who and who is giving thumbs down. and in the end a faulty system is used as fact to axe blogers by people all to willing to strike fast and hard then CYA at a later time.
This use of shock and awe was put to use late last night when most working people are asleep. This is not the type of moderation that our founder Nick had in mind.

All those who are sick of moderation come on over and vent all you like at Hankeys Damn Yankee Way!

http://hankeysdamnyankeeway.lefora.com

Good call moderators.

Good point. That was just an unfortunate joke.

Actually, I always thought the screen name BIC was short for "Broker In Charge" and had something to do with the real estate industry, but I never spent a lot of time wondering about it - nor do I spend a lot of time worrying about who has multiple screen names and how they're all interrelated.

To put a screeching halt to these mind games, I have two other screen names on Anderson Talkzone, neither one of which has posted more than a time or two. One is "Trojan-Horse" (which I notified Nick of when I created it, because no forum administrator wants to have a "trojanhorse" running around his cyberspace), and the other one is "Editor-in-cheef" which was created as a joke to amuse my friends in the newspaper business.

-jdtippett

You have "friends" in the newspaper business ? Can you get them to do something about Stanley?