IBV,
C'mon girl, you have on several occasions put your two cents worth out there about Wyatt-can't say-this and Wyatt-don't -say-that and disrespected the posted matereals ( like our actions about Blue Laws, and how outraged it made u). With that said, I take it you concider Hankey's posts every time all good and proper, eh? Don't see anyone griping about his racist Obama-hatred, his assaults on just about anyone from the real world outside Anderson or endless other b.s he puts out. How about Prevail? How about ...... Yet lets b*tch about Wyatt's in you face attitude. I want to see across the board parity or this is simply the next Straight Talk in waiting, run by a small group and will remain small in input from outsiders...
As said before, you'd be surprised at whom reads this stuff, and who loves what I write!!!! I actually write what they WISH they could write without losing their (city/county) jobs.
As an afterthought: I personally enjoy having a banter and tit-for-tat with another blogger who's actually adamant about their view. It makes for good reading, and brings out the honesty that lacks so often in this ( and other) blogs. Even you & I disagree, right? yet I'll continue to discourse with you on council, traffic, color of the leaves or whatever the topics are. THATS what a real blog is supposed to be, and if this is going to turn into some Barney Fife outlook, then honestly what fun is that? Want small talk? Idle chit-chat? How dull and uninspiring is that? If I can elecit a reaction, then your brain works to either find agreement or find a debate. I cannot help it if OCCASIONALLY a bad word comes out. This is a big kids forum. I suggest JD and the rest add a disclaimer on the header page; Warning, there are big kids playing here. Enter and read at your own risk!
Sorry nomadron .. But I'm not the only one that this form of censorship happens to on this forum.
