

Humm, I could be torturing teenagers with Turkish? Sweet!
Jeez, Nick, does the whining ever stop with you? You construct a public forum so you'll have some reason to keep your job when all the others are falling away (BTW, did John Shaed make up his mind yet about whether to takethe demotion to reporter or leave all together? How about Kausler? Now, there's a picture. Don actually asking questions instead of editing press releases) and then you bitch and moan because the kiddies won't play nice on your playground.This act about being so put upon by your ungrateful children is getting kind of old.
Since so few seem to appreciate the wisdom and potential of community moderation (so much for the two years it took to get here.) And since so few seem to understand that freedom is protected by rules not license. And since so few seem to care about how bleak it is to live under anarchy, I have just have four words:I... JUST... GIVE ... UP
I will do everything in my power from now on to have nothing to do with this enterprise. It is finished. "All ye who enter here abandon all hope."
-nickcharalambous
Nick,
I don't understand. I thought we were getting things back on track. If you are truly giving up you need to change the name. You are still going to be taking blows and wasting time and emotion being upset if you don't. You must have received objectionable e-mails as I have not discerned any real problems here, just the usual grumblings. Out of curiosity, what happened to the "hide" mechanism.
VOR: I may not have agreed wholly with Hank's sin bin stay, but I wanted to uphold the will of some core members who I think deserve to have their opinions heard given the frequency with which they post ....and given their true support for this forum.-nickcharalambous
WHO ARE THESE CORE USERS? MR. HANKEY still should have the right to face his accuser(s).
You did not answer that question NICK.
I am going to keep asking this until either I get that answer PUBLICLY here or I get BANNED. Difference is, you'll be banning me just because you don't like my point of view. I have not threatend anyone with violence, and neither has HANKEY. Sure Hankey calls people by some "pet names". But many here user screen names anyway.
So again, what did he do.........and who said he did it?
Since so few seem to appreciate the wisdom and potential of community moderation (so much for the two years it took to get here.) And since so few seem to understand that freedom is protected by rules not license. And since so few seem to care about how bleak it is to live under anarchy, I have just have four words:I... JUST... GIVE ... UP
I will do everything in my power from now on to have nothing to do with this enterprise. It is finished. "All ye who enter here abandon all hope."
-nickcharalambous
That's real mature. Anytime it gets personal with you, you want to pick up your toys and go home.
Nothing is never said or threatened to shut this blog down when someone flames about MCW, BW, or JRP.
What a joke. You are going to make 10 - 15 posters very unhappy. What will they do with their lives?
WHO ARE THESE CORE USERS? MR. HANKEY still should have the right to face his accuser(s). You did not answer that question NICK. I am going to keep asking this until either I get that answer PUBLICLY here or I get BANNED. Difference is, you'll be banning me just because you don't like my point of view. I have not threatend anyone with violence, and neither has HANKEY. Sure Hankey calls people by some "pet names". But many here user screen names anyway. So again, what did he do.........and who said he did it?-voice-of-reason
VOR,
Apparently I'm not a "core user."
Again ... I will defend to my death the ability for others to express their opinions here. I may not agree with everyone ... heck there are some people's ideas that I totally abhor ... but at the end of the day, they need to express them.
Just keep the profanity out of it and ensure what is said can not be used or accused of being slander. Besides ... I've always said that if one has to resort to profanity to get their point across, someone should invest in a vocabulary book. There are far better ways to pick apart a person and their ideas without resorting to the "Seven Dirty Words."
- SSHM
I'm gone too NIck
I think you said that already.
I'm gone too NIck-republikin
Buh-bye!
Now, now, if you keep up nasty comments I just might hang around simply to annoy some of you.
I think I might have to file an FOI here in order to get to the bottom of this.
All you Democrats should be on this like stink on a scunk. Heck, you sure were all over every damn thing Pres. Bush did, wrong or not.....
I want to know who knew what.
When they knew it.
I want to see all the emails associated with these decisions as to who was being banned.(screen names are fine) Not like we are going to harrass them or anything but some of us want to know. But since Nick has has it with us.....taken his toys and left the blog......I guess MR. Hankey will never have his day in court and know who the accuser(s) are or even what the charges were against him.
Parden MR. Hankey or ruler of the Cocklebur.........who is with me?
Get off Nick's case. This should be an insignificant part of your life, but I am afraid a few of you live to show the other 15 people on here how smart you are.
Come on guys, get a life!
ps. life is not on this blog!
Are you seriously comparing the banning of Mr. Hankey from the Cocklebur with the Bush regime? I hope I am missing the sarcasm!
Was Hankey the one banned forever or just one of the ones who had to take a week off?
And again, the melodrama is a little over the top. The "speech" everyone is so concerned about protecting was essentially a battle over who was the "most gay." Also, I think they will all but one be back in a week after they sit in the corner and think about what they've done wrong. I swear, my classroom is less trouble than this blog most days, and I can hand out demerits there!
Let's all let this mess calm down and then schedule a nice blog lunch where we discuss our options for moderation and decide, with input from our "owners," what would be the most fair while also being the most effective.
I'm gone too NIck-republikin
didn't you say that before? Plus that's what the voters told your boss. He's gone! Yeah!
I think I might have to file an FOI here in order to get to the bottom of this. All you Democrats should be on this like stink on a scunk. Heck, you sure were all over every damn thing Pres. Bush did, wrong or not..... I want to know who knew what. When they knew it. I want to see all the emails associated with these decisions as to who was being banned.(screen names are fine) Not like we are going to harrass them or anything but some of us want to know. But since Nick has has it with us.....taken his toys and left the blog......I guess MR. Hankey will never have his day in court and know who the accuser(s) are or even what the charges were against him. Parden MR. Hankey or ruler of the Cocklebur.........who is with me?-voice-of-reason
Hmmm, no smiley face, I think I'm getting suckered here, but....
Are you serious?!? There's no Freedom of Information here, it's a dictatorship and you have no need to know. There's no court, no tribunal, no appeal. If Mr. Hankey wants to come back after his ban is over, he's going to have to work it out with Nick.
I'm not for anyone being banned. There are a few people on here who think they control this forum. (Give me a break. Do you even buy the paper?) As far as Nick I don't like the attacks on him personally but he also set this up as part of his job and was paid while he did it. If I'm wrong Nick please speak up. And VOR, like Hankey, what's with the fake bad spelling?-confused
What did I spell wrong?
Scunk is all I see, but I kind of like that spelling.
This Topic Is Locked To Guest Posts
It's been a while since this topic was active, if you'd like to get it going again, please post as a registered member
