rss

Topic: Bryant and Meadors Debate (September 11)

Page 1
posts 1–20 of 20
member
3291 posts

The Anderson County Taxpayers Association, chaired by Ed Jean, will conduct a political debate between Senator Kevin Bryant and challenger Dr. Marshall Meadors. The debate is scheduled on September 11, 7:00 pm, at Anderson County Main Public Library. Mr. Fred Foster, former Independent Mail Publisher, has agreed to moderate the debate.

Everyone is invited to attend the debate and submit questions through index cards, to be read by the moderator during the debate.

Since both candidates are great men, with sharply contrasting political views, this debate is expected to be the highlight of the November election in Anderson County.

member
134 posts
You're gonna need a bigger venue....
member
522 posts

Judging by the crowd the Adams/Drawdy debate drew, your right, Ernest. But Fred I'm so objective Foster? Please!

member
561 posts
This post is in danger of being hidden; give a thumbs up to save it, or a thumbs down to hide it.

Should be very interesting and I plan to be there.

Sen. Bryant will bring his platform of pro-life, one man/one woman marriage, vouchers, and Republican values of honest and open government, family values, etc. and support of Sen. McCain for president.

Mr. Meadors will bring his platform of abortion-on-demand, two of anything can marry, forced public schooling, Democratic values of more government and more welfare and Hussein Obama is the man.

We probably have never had such a clear choice in an election: American values or Socialist doctrine.

See you there!

member
3291 posts

Earnest Pen-fold,

You make a good point. Anderson County Taxpayers Association is planning to combine three meeting rooms in the library. However, it may still not be large enough. They may have to consider moving the event to the Civic Center.

member
1278 posts

That's odd Prevail, I thought Meadors was running on a platform of improving education, the environment, economic development and health care not those things you just made up.

member
3995 posts
This post is in danger of being hidden; give a thumbs up to save it, or a thumbs down to hide it.
Blogger, those all fall under the "Democratic values of more government and more welfare" clause. Wink
member
332 posts

Education is already about the largest, yet most ineffective, bureaucracy around. I think we can improve it without spending any more money or handing out vouchers to rich kids.

member
1018 posts

Yea, we can improve it without spending more money. Remove the politicians like Bryant from the process. Repeal "no child left behind" (a.k.a. just teach the kid how to take a test) let the administration boot out the bad apples, and let the teachers actually teach the material rather than just teaching kids to take a test. Give property tax breaks to parents whose kids stay on the honor roll all year...

Bryant is a pill counter, Meadors if a MD, NEITHER I repeat NEITHER are trained or educated as educators, so why the hell would we let them make decisions about education that affect the students?!?!?!?!?!?!

__________________
I only exist here to piss in your Whaeties.....
member
742 posts

So,ZN, you would make sure there were plenty of nice plump chickens available and then letthe foxes stand guard? You wouldn't have any elected participators inthe educational process? Hell, the problem now is that it become an industry, just like medicine. The common good in either of those areas has long since succumbed to the bottom line mentality we have in this country. So two guys used to navigating the world's largest bureaucracy should do pretty well in the second largest, don't you think?

member
742 posts

Hey Art, welcome back, man. Glad to see the mourning period is over.I know June was rough on you, but it's not as important as everyone on this blog likes to think it is. Politics in Anderson and America is something we overcome, not something we oversee.

member
561 posts
Blogger, you are listening to what Meadors SAYS, not what he truly belives in as the spokesman for the Dem platform.  You must read more about the platform (Democratic) that he represents to find the parts they don't want the public to know.  If you favor the few items I listed about Meadors then he is your man for sure.  But do check out the Dem platform more.
member
1278 posts

Somehow based on your writings here prevail I doubt you have a direct line to what Dr Meadors truly believes.

member
561 posts

Blogger, if Mr. Meadors is running as a Democrat and supported by Democrats, don't you believe that he will follow the platform of the Democrats?  What he 'truly' believes may not completely follow the Dem beliefs, but he, as a Democrat, is promoting their platform.  If we have a Republican that does not follow the Republican platform we do not call him a Republican, as was Raymond MacKay exposed. 

It is still true:  if it looks like a duck.....etc., etc.

member
294 posts

Well heck ask those three question at the debate.

member
34 posts

prevail,
What do you call all of the Republicans who are Pro-Choice? One of them, Tom Ridge is on the short list for possible VP's.

member
1018 posts


So,ZN, you would make sure there were plenty of nice plump chickens available and then letthe foxes stand guard? You wouldn't have any elected participators inthe educational process? Hell, the problem now is that it become an industry, just like medicine. The common good in either of those areas has long since succumbed to the bottom line mentality we have in this country. So two guys used to navigating the world's largest bureaucracy should do pretty well in the second largest, don't you think?

-dunebuggy

No, the state and feds should supply each district a specific amount of money per student and let each district decide how to teach their kids, and that should be the extent of their involvement. The kids in Oconee need different things than the kids on Orangeburg, just as the kids in South Carolina need different things than the kids in the People's Republic of Kaliforina. Right now the politicians are just focused on the test results, becasue of that the schools have to teach the kids to take a test rather than actually educating the kids so they don't lose additional funding. Also let the schools kick the scum kids out so the ones that want to learn can learn. It's about time that parents stop blaming the schools for their kids failures. Those parents need to look at the dumbass in the mirror for the person to blame as to why their kid is a total failure. Now shut your hole and take responsibility for your lack of parenting for once, don't medicate, educate your kids for once. If they fail, it's YOUR FAULT FOR BEING A CRAPPY PARENT!!!!

That's the problem with our country today, everything is the fault of everyone else except you..

__________________
I only exist here to piss in your Whaeties.....
member
1329 posts
ZN:  I especially agree with your points to boot out the ones that don't want to apply themselves as well as parents taking responsibility. 
__________________
Spare the advice: Wise men don't need it, and fools won't heed it....(Unknown)
member
165 posts
Kevin Bryant is in bed with NY Carpetbagger Howard Rich. See today's editorial by Paul Hyde in the Greenville News:




Howie Rich, the rich New Yorker who’s trying to buy the S.C. Legislature, hates public education.

At least that's the impression you get from hearing him speak.

Rich, who spent a half million dollars in our state’s primary election trying to put school voucher advocates in the S.C. Legislature, drips elitist contempt for S.C. public schools.

In a fawning interview (posted on You Tube) with S.C. Republican Party Chairman Katon Dawson, Rich describes public education supporters this way:

"The other side is in it for one thing — taxpayer dollars. They love it every year when the Legislature gives them more money for what they call ‘education.’"

What they "call ‘education’"? (In the interview, Rich supplies the quotation marks with his curled fingers.)

Well, that’s a nice slap in the face to 46,000 dedicated and hardworking South Carolina public school teachers, not to mention hundreds of thousands of parents and other supporters of public schools.

Contrary to what New Yorker Rich suggests, teachers and administrators in our state do not become educators for the sole purpose of lining their pockets with taxpayer dollars.

Most educators conscientiously dedicate their lives to the goal of helping 700,000 South Carolina young people become thoughtful citizens and productive members of society.

That’s not "education," in the sense intended by Rich’s sarcastic quotation marks.

That really IS education, in the most profound sense.

Rich shows his disgust and disrespect for public education and its supporters through name-calling. His favorite labels: the "educrat establishment," "the opposition," "the other side" and "the monolithic institution."

No one disputes that public schools have problems. But South Carolina teachers and administrators deserve better than to have their hard work, sacrifices and commitment dismissed with the sneering contempt that Rich so richly displays.

Has the man ever met a South Carolina teacher?

Do Dawson, the GOP state chairman, and Gov. Mark Sanford — who recently called Rich a "patriot" — really want to align themselves with an extremist who has such a nasty attitude toward public education?

Rich spent a lot of money in the primaries through about two dozen companies. Some South Carolinians are beginning to examine the legality of that.

You can bet Rich plans to spend a lot of money in the general election here.

In the interview, Rich admits to ideological motivations.

"You might call it ideology," says Rich. "I believe in something strongly and I want to make it happen."

So much for why Rich wants to impose his will on South Carolina.

But does it matter to Rich what South Carolinians want for their own schools?

Most of us in this state attended public schools. Many of us know teachers and some of us have family members in public education. Many of us have children in the public schools.

We know first hand of the dedication and hard work of educators.

We know also that public education is one of the sturdy pillars of whatever prosperity we as individuals and as a state now enjoy.

Sorry, Howie, but we South Carolinians are not about to roll over and play dead while you trash our public schools.

member
2775 posts
Should be very interesting and I plan to be there. Sen. Bryant will bring his platform of pro-life, one man/one woman marriage, vouchers, and Republican values of honest and open government, family values, etc. and support of Sen. McCain for president. Mr. Meadors will bring his platform of abortion-on-demand, two of anything can marry, forced public schooling, Democratic values of more government and more welfare and Hussein Obama is the man. We probably have never had such a clear choice in an election: American values or Socialist doctrine. See you there!

-prevail



I guess the more one tells a lie, the better the chance of someone believing it.
First or all, it is Dr., not Mr., Meadors.
Second, please show me where Dr. Meadors has a platform of abortion on demand. Aint there ! Stop by his headquarters and get a copt of his platform. It's easy reading. . .
Third, please be civil enough not to refer to a human as an anything. It is two of any gender that can marry. In any event, neither of these are in the Doctor's platform, so wrong again.
Nor forced public schooling, nor more government, nor more welfare. . .
__________________
ENJOY THE RIDE, THERE IS NO RETURN TICKET. CARLIN
Page 1
posts 1–20 of 20

This Topic Is Locked To Guest Posts

It's been a while since this topic was active, if you'd like to get it going again, please post as a registered member

join now