I have a question for those who are supportive of such a large animal program...
who pays for it? There are 180,000 people in Anderson County. Maybe 3000 of them own large animals. Why should the vast majority bear the burden of paying for such a program? Why not put a license fee on all large animals, thus generating the necessary money to pay for the related community support? Then funnel all fines assessed against negligent owners back into the program as well.
I think the same solution should also be applied to the animal shelter, btw...
-palmetto-native
I used to think that licensing fees are the appropriate way to raise money for animal control and the animal shelter. But then I came to understand that only responsible animal owners will pay the license fees, and they are not the ones causing a need for county-provided animal services.
It's irresponsible animal owners, ones who allow their animals to breed indiscriminately and run loose and fail to provide the minimum standards of care for their animals, that cause the county to pass animal control ordinances and to create the animal control and animal shelter departments. These people are unlikely to pay license fees and will deny that an animal is theirs when confronted, instead letting the animal be confiscated....'cause, they can just get another one at the Jockey Lot, or from their brother-in-law, or just steal one....and the County is left holding the bag.
If animal services are an equal tax burden on all citizens in the county, at least the irresponsible animal owners will pay something, and the responsible animal owners will pay less than a license fee. Even people that own no animals will get some benefit from the animal services if they have to call in a dog in their yard or a horse in the road or turn in their neighbor for starving a dog.
If you're not familiar with what an animal control officer or a shelter worker has to deal with every day, watch some of the shows on Animal Planet channel, especially the Houston, Miami, or Detroit Animal Cops shows. I can't imagine how they go to work every day.
Both State law and County ordinance specify what happens to fines collected from animal abuse cases. For violations of State cruelty laws, half the fine can be given to a non-profit organization if that organization was
"materially involved in or aiding in the prosecution of the violation". Otherwise, I think it just goes into the County coffers.
Currently 100% of the budget for the animal control department and the animal shelter is for cats and dogs, and 100% of the $3.2 million for the new shelter is for cats and dogs. So, to answer your question, no one pays for a large animal program because there isn't one.
For large animals, specifically horses, there's a public-private partnership between the Sheriff's Department and PEARL. The Sheriff investigates and prosecutes, and PEARL picks up the pieces after horses are seized. The Sheriff has no additional budget for large animal services, and PEARL depends on donations from caring people in the community and the efforts of it's volunteer force.