+0
permalink
Ken Allison is the one who is making money from the real estate involved in the ethanol distribution center.
+0
permalink
Ken Allison is the one who is making money from the real estate involved in the ethanol distribution center.- Porter Osborne
Okay, I will bite. What are you trying to say here? What's your point? Ties to government somehow? Please elaborate on why we ought to care about a private real estate's broker's business.
+0
permalink
Ken Allison is the one who is making money from the real estate involved in the ethanol distribution center.- Porter Osborne
Okay, I will bite. What are you trying to say here? What's your point? Ties to government somehow? Please elaborate on why we ought to care about a private real estate's broker's business.- coke_stevenson
Various people said it was Constituent who was making money from it...
+0
permalink
Ken Allison is the one who is making money from the real estate involved in the ethanol distribution center.- Porter Osborne
Okay, I will bite. What are you trying to say here? What's your point? Ties to government somehow? Please elaborate on why we ought to care about a private real estate's broker's business.- coke_stevenson
Various people said it was Constituent who was making money from it...- ahammett
I guess the question would then be does const. work for that guy? I don't know. What's the deal here? Potter seems like he/she is trying to stir something up. I just don't what exactly.
+0
permalink
That's the point Joke, this is a private business transaction. To insinuate otherwise is malicious intent to destroy the professional career of an individual with lying innuendo.
+0
permalink
Ken Allison is a very qualified realtor in good standing. He brokered this deal. Mr. Allison worked long hours on this and credit should be placed where credit is due.
Some people are trying to use the existence of this deal as an excuse to spread more lies and innuendo in an attempt to ruin the professional careers, personal lives, and political futures of two individuals.
Some people are trying to use the existence of this deal as an excuse to spread more lies and innuendo in an attempt to ruin the professional careers, personal lives, and political futures of two individuals.
+0
permalink
McAbee and Plummer are agents in Allison's company. For every listing or sale made by one (or both) of them, Allison receives a cut as broker-in-charge.
+0
permalink
McAbee and Plummer are agents in Allison's company. For every listing or sale made by one (or both) of them, Allison receives a cut as broker-in-charge.- troglodyte
This is just one more lie based on untrue assumptions by an unqualified reporter, reporting on something he does not understand. Read the previous poster, Allison Brokered the deal. Allison will profit. You are using half baked assumptions in an attempt to spread lies and innuendos with malicious intent.
+0
permalink
What part of my post is a lie?
What part of my post is based on assumption?
Changing the closing papers to hide the McAbee/Plummer connection in that transaction will not save McAbee from answering questions by the Ethics Commission.
Where is the malicious intent?
What part of my post is based on assumption?
Changing the closing papers to hide the McAbee/Plummer connection in that transaction will not save McAbee from answering questions by the Ethics Commission.
Where is the malicious intent?
+0
permalink
What part of my post is a lie?
What part of my post is based on assumption?
Changing the closing papers to hide the McAbee/Plummer connection in that transaction will not save McAbee from answering questions by the Ethics Commission.
Where is the malicious intent?- troglodyte
Now you have made a very serious accusation insinuating illegal actions: changing legal documents. Where is documentation of illegal activity, or are you continuing your quest maliciously to destroy the professional reputation of an individual you have maliciously maligned repeatedly on this blog? Or are you suggesting Ken Allison would be party to illegal activity?
You just make one lying assumption after another making up new lying innuendo every post you contrive. Stan Welch you are a joke for a reporter.
+0
permalink
What say we let Herb and the boys down at the Ethics Commission sort it out. Okay with you, Shite?
+0
permalink
Let’s say you, Trog/ Stan Welch, stop making very serious accusations stating that illegal actions have taken place. You have obviously by your ridiculous response are admitting that there is no evidence or documentation of illegal activity which you so readily insinuated in your quest to maliciously destroy the professional reputation of an individual you have maliciously maligned repeatedly on this blog.
Now in your malicious attempt to maliciously malign another blogger you have suggested Ken Allison would be party to illegal activity.
You just make one lying assumption after another making up new lying innuendo every post you contrive. Stan Welch you are a joke for a reporter.
Now in your malicious attempt to maliciously malign another blogger you have suggested Ken Allison would be party to illegal activity.
You just make one lying assumption after another making up new lying innuendo every post you contrive. Stan Welch you are a joke for a reporter.
+0
permalink
Economic interest forms are due on April 15, 2008. All you have to do is go to Columbia and pull McAbee's and his Assistants Economic interest forms.
If they made any money on this project, then they have to disclose it. It's that simple. As far as I know, Mr. Allison will not have to file a form.
If they made any money on any thing that public money was used to purchase or even improve a property. They have to disclose it.
Do your homework folks.
If McAbee has nothing to hide then he needs to publicly state why " he excused himself" from the discussion and meeting.
Simple enough.
If they made any money on this project, then they have to disclose it. It's that simple. As far as I know, Mr. Allison will not have to file a form.
If they made any money on any thing that public money was used to purchase or even improve a property. They have to disclose it.
Do your homework folks.
If McAbee has nothing to hide then he needs to publicly state why " he excused himself" from the discussion and meeting.
Simple enough.
+0
permalink
The fact is that he did recuse himself PUBLICALLY, and the malicious attempt to attack a person's character based on the FACT he did the honest thing is just another silly post by willieh in a string of silly posts maliciously attempting to hurt a person professionally, personally, and politically. There is no place for that here.
+0
permalink
If McAbee has nothing to hide then he needs to publicly state why " he excused himself" from the discussion and meeting.
Simple enough.- willieh
What is simple enough is this:
Since Councilman McAbee recused himself on Tuesday night from discussions and debate regarding this issue, all one has to do is pull the form and see why.
It's all there in black-and-white (unless Bill used a blue pen to fill out the form ... which would make it black and blue and white).
To this very point, you can also see where our resident political neophyte engaged in an act of Political Grandstanding when she asked the question "What is Bill McAbee's involvment."
It's all on the form ... go read it.
Oh wait ... she's the same councilmember that showed up to council with an agenda item but was unprepaired to speak about it.
Oh wait ... she SHOULD know, as a member of council, those forms you fill out when one recuses themselves are available for review.
Oh wait ... she might not have know that those forms were available for review ... which just serves to solidify her general incompentence and status as a political neophyte.
- SSHM
+0
permalink
The fact is that he did recuse himself PUBLICALLY, and the malicious attempt to attack a person's character based on the FACT he did the honest thing is just another silly post by willieh in a string of silly posts maliciously attempting to hurt a person professionally, personally, and politically. There is no place for that here.- Shih
There is no intent to attack anyone. Where's the attack? The question was raised, I simply said go to the Ethics Forms. If McAbee made some bucks off the deal, good for him. He needs to make it known "publicly". He is a public official, and it needs to be seen as an above board transaction.
I am sure it is. But the public just needs to know. That is why Ethics Forms are completed.
+0
permalink
The fact is that he did recuse himself PUBLICALLY, and the malicious attempt to attack a person's character based on the FACT he did the honest thing is just another silly post by willieh in a string of silly posts maliciously attempting to hurt a person professionally, personally, and politically. There is no place for that here.- Shih
There is no intent to attack anyone. Where's the attack? The question was raised, I simply said go to the Ethics Forms. If McAbee made some bucks off the deal, good for him. He needs to make it known "publicly". He is a public official, and it needs to be seen as an above board transaction.
I am sure it is. But the public just needs to know. That is why Ethics Forms are completed.- willieh
You have repeatedly,relentlessly and maliciously attacked constituent with endless lies and innuendo. Now you suddenly want credibility. You are about as innocent and credible as Stan Welch.
This Topic Is Locked To Guest Posts
It's been a while since this topic was active, if you'd like to get it going again, please post as a registered member